The workflow, in plain English
Before: You read a political article with bold claims about unemployment rates. You think “is that right?” but checking means opening a new tab, searching, finding a source, losing your place. You don’t bother.
After: Next to the unemployment claim, a small checkmark appears. Hover: “Accurate. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Jan 2026.” Next to another claim, an orange warning: “Misleading. Technically correct but excludes part-time workers.” You become a more informed reader without doing any extra work.
Why traditional tools can’t: Fact-checking extensions use static databases. Dassi reads the actual claim contextually and checks it against multiple sources, adapting to any article’s specific language.
Step-by-step
- Open the article you’re reading.
- Ask dassi to annotate factual claims with sources.
- Review annotations; click through sources only when needed.
- Optionally create a short “verified summary” to share.
Example prompts to try
- “Fact-check the numeric claims in this article and add sources.”
- “Flag any misleading comparisons or missing baselines.”
- “Summarize what’s confirmed vs. what’s opinion.”
Tips for better results
- Be specific about what you want injected into the page (buttons, filters, a panel, a summary, etc.).
- If the page has multiple sections, tell dassi exactly what to focus on (e.g., “the transactions table” or “the diff for file X”).
- Prefer safe workflows first: draft, summarize, label, and prepare — then take actions (submit, purchase) only after review.